Defensible screening decisions, not just match scores.
Screen people and companies against the sources you choose. Get back a decision you can defend to an auditor: which sources it checked, which it could not, and the reasoning behind the result. Incomplete work never quietly reads as clear.
For compliance, risk, and engineering teams at fintechs and payments businesses.
50 test screens / month · no credit card · plan coverage shown before you run
REQ-9F2A · Meridian Logistics Ltd · Türkiye
Review requiredServed decision
Review required
Clearance withheld. One in-scope source did not answer, so coverage is incomplete.
- Execution mode
- Standard
- Coverage
- Partial · 1 source unavailable
- Candidate set
- Complete
- Evidence capsule
- Available
Cannot be treated as clear; route to review.
Sources checked · list version
OFAC SDN
v2026-08-31
UK Sanctions List
v2026-08-30
UN Consolidated
v2026-08-31
One in-scope source
n/a
Screens against sources published by
A no-hit is not automatically a clearance.
A match score answers one question: did anything resemble this name? It cannot tell an auditor whether every in-scope source was checked, whether the lists were current, or whether an unavailable source was quietly treated as a pass.
{
"match_score": 0.0,
"result": "clear"
}Did every source respond? Was the list current? Was the candidate set complete? You cannot answer, and neither can your regulator.
{
"verdict": "no_candidate_match",
"coverage_status": "partial",
"candidate_set_complete": true,
"evidence_capsule_id": "9f2a4c7e…",
"clearance_eligible": false
}No candidate matched, but one in-scope source was unavailable, so coverage is partial and clearance is withheld. The gap is on the record, not hidden by a green result.
Four conditions before a clear can stand.
A no-hit only becomes eligible for your policy's clearance path once every condition below is satisfied. Any one that fails holds the result for review, automatically and visibly on the record.
01Was standard mode run?
Exact-only never earns a compliance clearance.
02Did every in-scope source respond?
A source that did not answer keeps coverage partial.
03Was the candidate set complete?
A truncated or capped candidate set cannot clear.
04Is the evidence record available?
The decision has to be reconstructable later.
Only then: eligible for your policy's clearance path.
The policy and legal decision stays yours. Verifex supplies the proof; it does not make your legal judgement.
Read the full contractKnow what was checked, and what was not.
Current, stale, and unavailable sources stay visibly distinct. A source that is frozen upstream or unreachable never quietly becomes a clean result. It is disclosed on the record and in the public catalog.
Refreshing on schedule from the publisher.
Frozen or delayed upstream; flagged, not hidden.
No successful ingest; excluded from a clear.
Representative states the live catalog exposes. Freshness is not cadence.
Evaluate it at the depth your role needs.
Run a test screen
50 free screens a month, no card. Plan coverage is shown before you run.
Create an API keyRead the API docs
The response contract, SDKs, webhooks, and evidence retrieval, for engineers.
Open the docsDiscuss an evaluation
Source configuration, retention, security review and DPA, for compliance and procurement.
Talk to usSecurity & trust
Implemented, contractual, and planned controls are stated separately. A self-administered benchmark and subprocessor list are published.
Pricing