Sanctions screening API that preserves evidence behind every decision.
Screen people and companies against configured sanctions and watchlist sources. The response exposes candidate, coverage, and evidence context so your policy can make a reviewable decision.
Screening truth is per result. A no-hit alone is not a clearance. Treat a result as clear only when Standard Screening is clearance-eligible, source coverage is complete, the candidate set is complete, and the result has zero matches. Otherwise the result remains unresolved and needs your policy or review.
A match result is not enough.
A response needs to show more than a risk label. Verifex returns the execution and evidence-availability context needed to review what happened without representing incomplete work as a clean result.
Confidence scores
Candidate evidence and decision fields support review. A score or similar name does not confirm identity by itself.
Source context
Responses distinguish sources screened, plan exclusions, and unavailable in-plan sources so partial coverage is visible.
Point-in-time evidence
Evidence persistence is explicit. A durable record can support review; pending or unavailable evidence cannot be claimed as complete proof.
Decision contract
A zero-match result is not enough on its own.
The API returns the conditions a caller must check before treating a screening result as clear. A retrieved candidate is not a confirmed identity, and an unavailable, partial, or capped result is not complete coverage.
- screening_mode
- An `exact_only` result may never be read as a clearance. The mode deliberately skips fuzzy, phonetic, transliteration and typo recovery, so “no exact candidate” is not evidence the party is unlisted.
- clearance_eligible
- When false, no combination of other fields makes the result clean. Treat it as unresolved regardless of `risk_level`.
- coverage_status
- Partial or unavailable coverage cannot clear. Absence of a hit in the sources that answered says nothing about the ones that did not.
- candidate_set_complete
- A truncated set cannot clear. No-hit inside a capped set is not no-hit — it is no-hit in the part that was examined.
From raw name to reviewable decision.
Input
Name, country, entity type, DOB
Normalize
Transliteration, tokenization, deduplication
Screen
Multi-algorithm matching across configured sources
Resolve
Entity disambiguation and alias consolidation
Adjudicate
Confidence scoring with structured rationale
Evidence
Point-in-time audit capsule with list versions
What the API delivers.
Global source coverage
OFAC, UN, UK, and other configured sanctions, PEP, watchlist, and debarment sources. Coverage depends on the active plan and environment.
Multi-script matching
Fuzzy, phonetic, and transliteration matching across Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic and Greek. Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Thai are not yet screenable. Those screens return review, never clear.
Entity resolution
Returns candidate-level identity evidence so reviewers can distinguish a retrieved record from a confirmed identity.
Decision context
Returns structured decision, coverage, candidate-completeness, and reason fields for review. A similarity score alone is not identity certainty.
Review boundaries
Separates potential matches, analyst-confirmed identities, and unresolved candidates. Analyst disposition does not become a machine decision.
Audit trail
Responses disclose evidence availability and preserve recorded provenance where durable evidence is available. An unavailable record is not presented as proof.
Published limits
Use the current API documentation for supported request limits. Verifex does not publish a latency SLA on this page without measured evidence.
Monitoring & webhooks
Watch and webhook availability depends on the active plan, configured sources, and execution state. No unmeasured delivery-time claim is implied.
Every decision leaves proof.
The response identifies the evidence state at send time. Where a durable record is available, it carries the recorded decision context for later review. It does not turn a pending or unavailable record into proof.
- Query and the screening contract that ran
- Sources screened, plan exclusions, and unavailable sources
- Candidate-set completeness and truncation state
- Decision and identity-evidence context where returned
- Evidence persistence state and capsule reference when available
Illustrative response fragment, not a verbatim API payload:
{
"query": {
"name": "Example Entity",
"type": "entity"
},
"matches": [],
"total_matches": 0,
"screening_mode": "standard",
"clearance_eligible": true,
"coverage_status": "complete",
"candidate_set_complete": true,
"candidates_truncated": false,
"evidence_persistence": "pending"
}Illustrative response shape. Consult the API reference for the current contract and every field.
Measured on our internal benchmark.
We publish a transparent benchmark test set covering true positives, false positives, transliterations, aliases, and false positive cases. No sales call required.
Measured August 12, 2026 on the deployed engine: 0 severe false positives across 5,000 adversarial negatives, 97.33% exact-name recall.. Self-administered benchmark. Results will vary on different datasets.
Official SDKs and REST API. Ready to integrate.
Start with the documented request and response contracts. Screening, permitted webhook subscriptions, and evidence retrieval each have their own explicit availability and safety conditions.
curl -X POST https://api.verifex.dev/v1/screen \
-H "Authorization: Bearer vfx_..." \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "Rosneft",
"type": "entity",
"country": "RU"
}'Illustrative response fragment, not a verbatim API payload:
{
"matches": [...],
"total_matches": 0,
"screening_mode": "standard",
"clearance_eligible": true,
"coverage_status": "complete",
"candidate_set_complete": true,
"evidence_persistence": "pending"
}Explore the full platform
OFAC Screening
SDN coverage with source freshness surfaced.
PEP Screening
Enhanced due diligence for politically exposed persons.
AML Screening
Screening infrastructure for AML workflows, with coverage and evidence context.
Continuous Monitoring
Watch entities and get alerts on list changes.
Start screening with evidence.
Start with the current plan limits, then evaluate screening coverage and decision evidence against your own policy requirements.