A fit comparison, not a winner board
Verifex vs NameScan
Compare an evidence-first API with NameScan's web, pay-as-you-go, and due-diligence screening services.
Choose from operating model, evidence requirements, and ownership cost. Vendor features and commercial terms change; confirm them directly before procurement.
Third-party details reviewed 13 August 2026. NameScan services and pricing (opens in a new tab)
The decision frame
Start with what your team wants to own.
NameScan offers pay-as-you-go PEP, sanctions, adverse-media, identity, and KYB services alongside an online platform and developer resources. Its public pricing page currently directs users to select a service rather than presenting one universal per-check price, so cost should be confirmed for the exact workflow.
Verifex offers transparent flat-rate pricing from $49/month after a 50-screen free tier, an internal benchmark with disclosed methodology (0 severe false positives across 5,000 adversarial negatives (95% ci ≤ 0.077%)), and self-serve signup. The integration experience is built around a REST API with OpenAPI spec and official SDKs for Python, Node.js, Go, and Rust.
The practical difference is product shape. NameScan offers a broader menu of checks and reports; Verifex centers API-first screening, explicit coverage state, benchmarked decision semantics, and a durable evidence record. Validate source suitability and total cost against your own volume and jurisdictions.
For implementation detail, review the Verifex screening workflow, including coverage semantics, evidence, and integration boundaries.
Side by side
Compare the operating model.
This table is a directional evaluation aid, not a substitute for current vendor documentation, a security review, or legal and procurement diligence.
| Decision point | Verifex | NameScan |
|---|---|---|
| Free access | 50 screens/month | Free one-off checks advertised |
| Developer integration | OpenAPI + official SDKs | API and developer centre |
| PEP screening | Yes | Yes |
| Fuzzy matching | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | Yes | Yes |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | Yes |
| Published production-engine benchmark | Yes | Verify with vendor |
| Confidence scores | Yes | Verify with vendor |
Verifex fits when
You want the operation managed and the decision exposed.
- Transparent flat-rate pricing from $49/month
- Published accuracy benchmark (0/5,000 severe FP, 97.33% recall)
- Free tier with 50 screens/month
- Confidence scores on every match
NameScan may fit when
Its model aligns more closely with what you need to control.
- PEP, sanctions, adverse-media, ID, and KYB services
- Pay-as-you-go service options
- Online screening platform and reports
- Free one-off check tools for evaluation
Inspect the integration
The first useful proof is a real response.
Send one request, inspect the coverage and evidence semantics, then decide whether the workflow belongs in your stack.
curl -X POST https://api.verifex.dev/v1/screen \
-H "Authorization: Bearer vfx_your_api_key" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "Rosneft", "type": "entity"}'Questions to resolve
Make the tradeoffs explicit.
How should I compare Verifex and NameScan pricing?
Verifex publishes plan prices and included volume. NameScan advertises pay-as-you-go services, but the current public page does not present one universal price for every screening product. Price the exact checks, reports, monitoring, and expected volume with each provider before comparing totals.
Does NameScan have better PEP coverage?
NameScan markets global PEP screening. Verifex uses configured PEP feeds, including Wikidata where applicable. Raw country or record counts do not establish regulatory suitability; validate current officeholders, former PEPs, relatives, close associates, provenance, and refresh behavior for your jurisdictions.
How do the developer experiences differ?
NameScan publishes a developer centre and API resources. Verifex publishes an OpenAPI specification and maintains official Python, Node.js, Go, and Rust SDKs. Evaluate authentication, error semantics, evidence payloads, sandbox access, and the language support your team actually needs.
Which is better for high-volume screening?
Verifex offers flat-rate pricing which is typically more predictable at high volume. Both support batch screening. Verifex is also designed for low-latency, real-time use cases.
Evaluate with your own workflow